Images are still loading please cancel your preview and try again shortly.
Eingabehilfen

Global Guide to Anti-Bribery and Corruption Law and Enforcement

Introduction

Bribery and corruption distort competition, increase costs and lead to unfair treatment of individuals and businesses alike. In a desire to win that next contract or increase profitability, individuals and businesses still seek to influence the outcome of tender processes or the decisions of public officials with bribes. Supply chains are impacted, consumers exploited and communities damaged by illicit financial deals that unduly and illegally benefit those involved.

And the problem is a global one. The cross-border structure of many businesses today means that bad conduct can take place across jurisdictions, dressed up as usual commercial practice or simply hidden from view.

Global enforcement authorities recognise the damage such misconduct causes. But how successful are they at tackling crime and wrongdoing? What penalties are available to them to punish illegal behaviour? And when does “ordinary” commercial conduct fall the wrong side of the line?

An understanding of the global reach of anti-bribery and corruption (ABC) regulation, as well as the application of it within a specific jurisdiction, is key to managing risk for today’s international businesses. As national enforcement agencies increasingly cooperate with each other to tackle financial crime, we have seen an uptick in wide-reaching cross-border investigations and correspondingly large penalties for companies engaging in unlawful behaviour.

Linklaters’ Global Guide to Anti-Bribery and Corruption Law and Enforcement examines how jurisdictions across the globe are tackling commercial wrongdoing and will be of particular interest to businesses with international operations. It delivers quick insights into ABC law and practice across 20 jurisdictions, answering nine key questions per region:

  • What legislation makes corrupt activities unlawful in this jurisdiction?
  • What activities are prohibited?
  • Do the corrupt activities have to take place in whole or in part within this jurisdiction to be considered unlawful?
  • Who do the rules apply to?
  • What are the fines/penalties?
  • What approach is taken by regulators to the giving and receiving of gifts and hospitality in commercial settings?
  • What approach is taken to enforcement in practice?
  • Are there any legal restrictions on a company’s ability to use or deal with the proceeds of contracts or sales which are known or suspected to have been procured by corrupt conduct?
  • What future developments are anticipated in this area?


Download Global Guide

Key Themes

The approaches to dealing with bribery and corruption offences and the challenges faced by enforcement authorities differ across the jurisdictions surveyed. However, a number of key themes are common. These are discussed below, with examples drawn from across the globe.

Authorities continue to clamp down on corrupt misconduct...

  • In the U.S. new laws have criminalised the demand for or acceptance by a foreign public official (FPO) of bribes with a U.S. nexus, closing a gap in the FCPA which dealt only with the supply side.
  • Changes to the rules on corporate criminal liability in the UK have made it easier to prosecute companies for economic wrongdoing.
  • In Mainland China, there has been an uptick in enforcement, particularly against corruption impacting ordinary livelihoods, such as in the healthcare sector.
  • Enforcement in France has become notably more severe in recent years. However, the acquittal rate for bribery prosecutions is higher than for other types of prosecution. 

....although some jurisdictions are more active than others

  • Despite Australia operating a formal self-reporting code for companies, enforcement there remains low.
  • Germany prosecuted fewer cases in 2022 than in the previous year. Despite the low number of prosecutions in Luxembourg for bribery, there are no plans there to develop the area further.
  • There have been no prosecutions in Portugal at all for foreign bribery, although lots of enforcement activity for domestic offences.
  • Authorities in Sweden adopt a strict approach towards corruption and score well on Transparency International’s Corruption Perceptions Index. But even Sweden has been criticised by the OECD and EU for a lack of enforcement action.
  • Surprisingly, and contrary to all other jurisdictions surveyed, the U.S. and Australia continue to make an exception for facilitation payments.

Governments continue to push enforcement onto the private sector through an increased emphasis on corporate compliance and self-regulation

  • The UK’s corporate offence of failing to prevent bribery by employees, agents and other “associated persons” is being emulated across the globe; a similar offence has been introduced in South Africa and one will come into effect in Australia later in 2024.
  • In Spain, private companies are focussing on compliance and the prevention of wrongdoing through the introduction of internal ABC programmes while in Germany, companies may be liable if their owners fail to implement required supervisory measures to prevent bribery by their employees.
  • In France, large companies are obliged to implement a compliance plan to identify and mitigate against corruption, with administrative sanctions for individuals and companies that fail to comply.
  • Singapore’s regime is particularly strict; companies are held accountable for wrongdoing by employees regardless of their internal prevention measures.
  • In Portugal, however, there remain challenges and a notable lack of monitoring over regulations introduced in 2021 establishing compliance and whistleblowing regimes to prevent and sanction illegal conduct.

Confession and cooperation remain key

  • The deferred prosecution agreement (DPA) regime in the UK continues to be employed to settle bribery investigations and has become the usual way of dealing with such prosecutions in the right circumstances.
  • In Singapore, the outcome of the first case to be dealt with by way of DPA is awaited, while the question of whether to introduce a DPA regime in Australia will be considered again in 2026.
  • The U.S. incentivises corporate disclosure and cooperation through specific policies, while the Belgian “repentance” regime offers a reduced sentence in return for a confession and the provision of evidence against third parties. Similarly, in Japan, the prosecutor may negotiate agreements with those accused of bribery and corruption in return for information.

While gifts and hospitality remain largely unregulated, they are increasingly on authorities’ radars

  • Few jurisdictions have specific laws dealing with gifts and hospitality (G&H) but it is widely recognised that they may constitute bribery given the typically broad definition of an “advantage”. Whether G&H are challenged by local authorities may depend on their value and “social acceptability”.
  • Generally, public officials are subject to stricter rules in this regard than private entities and may even be forbidden from accepting or offering anything at all.

Cooperation on cross-border investigations and enforcement continues to grow

  • Settlements such as the Airbus investigation demonstrate domestic agencies’ willingness to work together to tackle and sanction wrongdoing.
  • Meanwhile, the U.S. continues to assume a wide jurisdiction when it comes to FCPA enforcement internationally.
  • The European Union has committed to establishing a pan-EU regime for addressing wrongdoing in its draft directive on combatting corruption.
  • The UK’s Serious Fraud Office has signalled its intention to work ever more closely with investigation and enforcement partners across the globe.

Related Topics

x Find a Lawyer